Established 1994

Columned stone facade of a Federal Reserve Bank building, where the rate decisions behind a possible soft landing are taken

Editorial note. This commentary was written at the end of 2023 and reflects the expectations prevailing at that point. The named forecasts below are a record of what was being said at the time, not a prediction we are making today. The sections towards the end on how rate cycles affect portfolios and on positioning are general and durable; the forecasts are not. Nothing here is a recommendation or personalised advice.

Analyzing the Current Economic Landscape

As the year draws to a close, the Federal Reserve's latest meeting has sparked discussions about the possibility of a "soft landing" for the U.S. economy. This term refers to a scenario where the economy slows down enough to curb inflation without triggering a full-blown recession. The concept of a soft landing has become particularly relevant as the Federal Reserve grapples with balancing interest rate hikes and economic growth.

Understanding the Inflation Soft Landing Concept

A soft landing in economic terms involves a delicate balance where the central bank successfully manages to slow down an overheated economy, thus controlling inflation, but without pushing it into a recession. It's like gently applying the brakes on a fast-moving vehicle to avoid a crash, ensuring a smooth deceleration. In the current context, it means bringing down inflation, which has been running high, back to the Federal Reserve's target of 2%, without causing significant job losses or a sharp decline in economic activity.

The Federal Reserve's Role in Shaping the Economy

The Federal Reserve, America's central bank, plays a critical role in managing the country's monetary policy. By adjusting interest rates, it can influence economic activity. Higher interest rates can cool down an overheated economy and bring down inflation, but they can also slow down economic growth and increase unemployment. Lower rates can stimulate the economy but might also lead to higher inflation. The challenge for the Fed is to find the right balance.

David Smith from Rockland expresses strong confidence in the likelihood of a soft landing. The Federal Reserve's current stance of maintaining interest rates suggests a positive view of the economy's resilience and a gradual decrease in inflation.

Mark Hamrick of Bankrate comments on the unexpected resilience of the U.S. economy amidst persistent recession fears. He sees a soft landing as the most probable scenario for the coming year, though he does not completely rule out a short, mild recession.

Bank cards tucked into a slim leather wallet, illustrating what a soft landing would mean for borrowing costs and personal finances

Consumer Impact: Borrowing Costs and Personal Finance

The financial markets are increasingly betting on the end of the Federal Reserve's cycle of raising interest rates, with potential rate cuts eyed for 2024. This shift could signal upcoming relief from high borrowing costs, especially for mortgages, credit cards, and auto loans, provided inflation continues its downward trajectory.

Brett House of Columbia Business School, however, warns that a decline in inflation doesn't necessarily mean a drop in prices but rather a stabilization. For consumers, this means while they might not see a significant decrease in prices, they can expect a halt in the rapid price increases witnessed in recent times.

The Ideal "Goldilocks" Scenario: Economic Growth and Inflation Balance

Achieving the "Goldilocks" scenario, where the economy grows at a pace that avoids a recession but also doesn't fuel inflation, is the Federal Reserve's target. In such a scenario, consumers can expect a gradual decrease in interest rates, continued robust economic growth, and a stable job market.

Market Reactions and Investor Sentiment

Despite the prevailing optimism, some experts like Solita Marcelli of UBS Global Wealth Management advise caution. They note that the recent stock and bond market rallies might not be sustainable and suggest that equity markets may be overly optimistic in pricing in positive outcomes.

Risks of a Hard Landing: Policy Decisions and Economic Implications

Central bank policymakers are unlikely to reduce rates merely for the sake of doing so. A rate cut would more likely be a response to a significant economic slowdown and rising unemployment. Such a scenario, known as a "hard landing," could have negative implications for the labor market and, consequently, consumers. In this context, the most critical determinant of household finances is job security.

Prospects and Challenges Ahead

While a recession in the latter half of 2024 has not been completely ruled out, the focus remains on the potential for a soft landing. This outcome would be favorable for the economy and individual financial health. However, the path to achieving this balance is fraught with challenges.

The Federal Reserve's decisions in the coming months will be crucial in determining the trajectory of the economy. Factors such as global economic conditions, geopolitical tensions, and domestic policy decisions will also play a significant role.

Consumer Strategies in the Current Economic Environment

In light of these economic predictions and uncertainties, it is wise for consumers to adopt a cautious approach to their finances. This might involve reassessing investment portfolios, considering refinancing options for loans, and exploring savings avenues that can withstand economic fluctuations.

What a Rate Cycle Actually Does to a Portfolio

Forecasts about the path of policy rates are interesting; the transmission mechanism is what matters to an investor, and it is far more stable than any forecast.

Bonds respond first and most mechanically. The price of a fixed-rate bond moves inversely to the yield the market demands, and how much it moves depends on how long the remaining cash flows are. Longer-dated holdings therefore swing more, in both directions, than shorter-dated ones. A change in the rate outlook consequently affects a bond portfolio's value before it affects anything in the real economy. Our guide to the impact of interest rates on bond portfolios covers this relationship in detail.

Cash stops being free. When policy rates are high, holding cash pays something and the opportunity cost of caution falls; when they fall, the reverse applies, and a large permanent cash balance becomes an active decision with a cost rather than a neutral default. Neither state is permanent, which is the argument for deciding how much cash you hold on the basis of what it is for — near-term commitments, an emergency reserve, a known liability — rather than on the basis of the prevailing rate. See our discussion of the role of cash in an investment portfolio.

Equities respond through two channels at once, which is why their reaction to rate news is so much less predictable than that of bonds. Rates affect what future earnings are worth today, and they affect the earnings themselves through demand and financing costs. The two can pull in opposite directions, and the market's view of which dominates changes faster than the underlying facts do.

Borrowing costs reprice on their own timetable. A mortgage on a fixed rate is unaffected until it is not; a tracker or a variable facility moves immediately. The relevant question for a borrower is not what rates do next but when their own arrangement is exposed to whatever has happened by then.

Why This Matters More If You Live Internationally

For an internationally mobile household the rate cycle arrives through an additional door: the currency.

Interest rate differentials between countries are one of the influences on exchange rates, which means a divergence in policy between two central banks can change the sterling value of dollar assets, or the euro cost of a sterling income, without anything happening to the underlying investments at all. Someone earning in one currency, holding assets in a second and facing school fees, a mortgage or a retirement in a third is exposed to that in a way a single-currency investor is not.

The practical response is not to forecast currencies, which is at least as difficult as forecasting rates. It is to reduce the mismatch: to know which currency your future commitments actually fall in, and to hold a proportion of your assets in that currency so that the two move together. Our guides to currency risk management and multi-currency banking set out how families do this in practice.

Two further points are specific to expatriates. Cash held offshore may be taxed differently from cash held at home, and a rise in deposit interest can create a reporting obligation where none existed before. And where a portfolio is reported to you in one currency but will eventually be spent in another, the performance figure you are shown may tell you less about your real position than you assume.

What Not to Do With a Macro Forecast

The commentary above is a reminder of how a widely held expectation reads at the time it is held. Several disciplines follow from that.

Do not restructure a long-term portfolio around a short-term view — the cost of being wrong is realised immediately while the benefit of being right is speculative. Do not confuse a consensus with a certainty; consensus views are already reflected in prices, which is precisely why acting on them adds so little. Do not let a rate outlook substitute for a plan: the questions of how much risk you can tolerate, what your money is for and when you will need it are unaffected by the next policy decision. And be wary of any commentary, including this one, that reads as though the future were knowable.

Why the Landing Is Judged by Jobs, Not by Prices

Two claims above sit in the article without their reasoning attached, and they turn out to be the same claim seen from different angles.

The first is Brett House's point that falling inflation does not mean falling prices. Inflation is a rate of change, not a level. When the rate falls from high to modest, the price level is still rising — just more slowly. The cumulative increases of the preceding years remain in the shop price, and only sustained deflation would reverse them, which no central bank is trying to engineer because falling prices bring problems of their own, including the incentive to defer purchases and the way they increase the real burden of existing debt. So a household experiencing a "successful" disinflation feels no relief at all in the weekly shop. What changes is that their wages, if they rise, begin to catch up rather than falling further behind.

The second is the observation that in a hard landing "the most critical determinant of household finances is job security". This is why the labour market, not the inflation print, is the gauge that tells you which landing you got. The channel a central bank actually operates on runs through demand: higher rates make borrowing dearer, firms and households spend and invest less, and firms facing weaker demand respond by moderating pay, then by hiring less, then by cutting jobs. Inflation falls somewhere along that sequence. The whole question of soft versus hard is how far down it the economy has to travel before prices respond.

That framing has a practical consequence for anybody reading rate commentary. A fall in inflation accompanied by stable employment is the soft landing; the same fall accompanied by rising unemployment is the hard one, and it will be described in the press as good news on inflation either way. The variable that determines whether a household is better or worse off is not in the headline.

It also explains why a rate cut is not straightforwardly welcome, as the section on hard-landing risks notes. Cuts arrive either because inflation has been beaten or because the economy is deteriorating, and those two causes call for opposite responses from anyone with a mortgage renewal, a job in a cyclical sector, or a portfolio weighted towards companies whose earnings depend on consumer demand.

The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise, and you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not a guide to future returns, and forecasts — including those quoted above — are not reliable indicators. Nothing in this article is personalised advice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Federal Reserve's pursuit of a soft landing is a complex and delicate endeavor. It requires balancing multiple economic factors to ensure stability and growth. For consumers, staying informed and adapting to changing economic conditions will be key to navigating the potential challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. As we move into 2024, the hope is for a stable and prosperous economic environment, but preparedness for different scenarios will be essential.


Stephen James Mitchell, the managing director who wrote this assessment of the Fed's soft landing and the inflation outlook

Stephen James Mitchell

As the Managing Director of Global Investments, I bring 25+ years of expertise in finance, wealth management, and real estate. I specialize in portfolio diversification, deal structuring, and wealth preservation, delivering data-driven strategies for sustainable success in global markets.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Rules, prices and regulations change; verify current requirements with a qualified adviser before acting.

Speak to a Global Investments adviser

Our independent advisers work with internationally mobile clients on pensions, investments, tax planning, and international financial structures.