Contents9 sections
On 6 April 2015, the UK pensions landscape changed more dramatically than at any point since the introduction of universal pensions. Chancellor George Osborne's "pension freedoms" gave defined contribution savers unprecedented control over how and when they accessed their retirement savings. A decade on, the reforms have reshaped retirement planning, created new risks, and had consequences that their architects did not fully anticipate. This article assesses the legacy.
What the Pension Freedoms Did
Before April 2015, the practical reality for most defined contribution pension savers was straightforward — if limiting. On reaching retirement, you could take up to 25% of your pension pot as a tax-free lump sum, and the rest had to be used to buy an annuity: a guaranteed income for life from an insurance company. Cashing out the rest was theoretically possible, but subject to a 55% "unauthorised payment" charge — effectively a punitive tax designed to prevent pension pots from being treated as savings accounts.
The 2015 reforms eliminated this compulsion entirely. From 6 April 2015, anyone aged 55 or over (57 from April 2028) with a defined contribution pension could:
- Take the entire fund as a cash lump sum (25% tax-free, 75% taxed as income in the year of withdrawal)
- Draw income flexibly via flexi-access drawdown (25% of each withdrawal tax-free, 75% taxed as income)
- Take uncrystallised fund pension lump sums (UFPLS — the 25%/75% split applied to each payment)
- Buy an annuity as before
- Use any combination of the above
- Leave the fund untouched as long as desired (no forced annuity purchase at any age)
The freedoms applied to personal pensions, SIPPs, and most group personal pensions. They did not apply to defined benefit schemes — those retained their traditional structure — and they did not apply to the state pension.
The Behavioural Response: How Savers Used the Freedoms
The initial response confounded some expert predictions. In the first year after the freedoms, cash withdrawals from pension pots surged. Many savers — particularly those with smaller pots — took the opportunity to access funds they had been unable to reach under the old regime.
Some of this was entirely rational: a person with a £25,000 pension pot would have been forced to buy a tiny annuity paying a few hundred pounds per year. Under the freedoms, taking the £25,000 as cash (£6,250 tax-free, £18,750 taxable) and managing it themselves was more appropriate for their needs.
For larger pots, the picture was more mixed. Some savers took large lump sums and invested them poorly in property deals or alternative investments that failed. Others moved money to family members, not realising this could trigger deliberate deprivation rules for means-tested benefits. A significant number triggered the Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) — reducing their future pension contribution limit to £10,000 per year — by accessing drawdown flexibility they did not realise had this consequence.
The pension scammers were quick to exploit the new environment. Offering "pension liberation" and investment returns from exotic schemes, fraudsters persuaded thousands of people to move their pension savings into vehicles that promptly collapsed or were stolen. The pension freedoms made it easier to release pension money — and fraudsters exploited the new ease of access.
The Annuity Market: A Structural Shift
The most dramatic and lasting structural change was in the annuity market. Before 2015, the annuity market was the largest compulsory financial product market in the UK — hundreds of thousands of people bought annuities each year because they had no practical alternative.
After the freedoms, annuity purchases fell by approximately 75%. Some major providers withdrew from the retail annuity market entirely, citing the collapse in volumes and the regulatory and capital burdens of managing large books of guaranteed liabilities. The product choice narrowed, specialist providers consolidated, and annuity innovation largely stalled.
From 2022 onwards, annuity rates recovered substantially — driven by rising gilt yields (annuity rates are closely linked to government bond returns). A 65-year-old with a £200,000 pension pot who would have received an annuity income of perhaps £8,000 per year in 2021 could receive £12,000–14,000 per year by 2024–2026. This recovery has sparked renewed interest in annuities as part of a blended retirement strategy.
Nevertheless, annuity purchase volumes remain far below pre-2015 levels. The cultural shift — from annuities as the default to drawdown as the new default — appears durable.
Drawdown Becomes the New Normal
Flexi-access drawdown — where the pension pot is invested and income drawn over time — became the defining post-freedom retirement vehicle. Financial advisers pivoted from annuity-selection services to drawdown management services. The concept of "decumulation planning" (managing the spending-down phase of a portfolio) emerged as a recognised advisory discipline.
This was not universally a good outcome. Drawdown is inherently more complex than an annuity:
- It requires ongoing investment decisions
- It exposes the retiree to sequence-of-returns risk (a major market fall early in retirement is disproportionately damaging)
- It can run out if withdrawals are too high or returns too low
- It requires discipline around sustainable withdrawal rates (commonly cited as 3.5–4% per year)
Many savers who accessed drawdown without advice — or with inadequate advice — found themselves drawing at unsustainable rates, holding inappropriate investments, or simply not managing the pot at all. For those without the interest or expertise to manage a drawdown portfolio, the annuity they rejected in 2015 may turn out to have been the right product after all.
The MPAA: An Unintended Consequence
The Money Purchase Annual Allowance was introduced alongside the pension freedoms as a safeguard against "pension recycling" — the practice of drawing pension income and then returning it to a pension to generate tax relief twice.
Once any flexi-access drawdown is accessed, the MPAA applies. This limits future defined contribution pension contributions to £10,000 per year (as of 2026), with no carry forward.
For anyone who wants to continue saving for retirement — perhaps returning to work after an early drawdown experiment, or continuing to work part-time — the MPAA is a severe restriction. Many savers triggered it inadvertently, unaware that taking a small drawdown payment or testing the flexibility of their pension access would permanently reduce their contribution capacity.
The Pension Freedoms and British Expats
For internationally mobile savers, the pension freedoms have made UK pensions more practically useful. Before 2015, a British national living abroad who had accumulated a meaningful DC pension faced the prospect of buying a UK annuity — often paid in sterling into a UK bank account — regardless of where they lived. The annuity option may not have aligned with their currency, income needs, or residency.
Under the freedoms, expats can:
- Leave the UK pension invested and draw flexibly from wherever they are in the world
- Take pension income under the DTA rules applicable to their country of residence
- Consider transferring to a QROPS (Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme) for local wrapper treatment with equivalent flexibility
- Time UK pension withdrawals in low-income years to minimise UK or overseas tax exposure
The freedoms have made UK pensions a more internationally portable vehicle, though the tax treatment of drawdown income abroad still requires careful DTA analysis.
The 2027 IHT Change: The First Reversal
For a decade, pensions under the freedom regime enjoyed a specific and valuable feature: DC pension funds passed on death were broadly exempt from inheritance tax. This made SIPPs and other DC pensions attractive vehicles not just for retirement income but for intergenerational wealth transfer — with some savers consciously delaying drawdown to preserve the pension pot for their heirs.
First announced at the Autumn Budget 2024 and now legislated in the Finance Act 2026 (which received Royal Assent on 18 March 2026), unused pension funds will be included in the deceased's estate for inheritance tax purposes from 6 April 2027. This represents the first significant policy reversal of a pension freedom principle: the notion that pensions are primarily estate planning vehicles is being curtailed.
From 6 April 2027, the deceased's personal representatives will be responsible for reporting and paying any IHT due on unused pension funds as part of administering the estate. The direction is clear — pensions will revert to being primarily retirement income vehicles, with less utility as tax-efficient estate planning tools.
This does not make the pension freedoms themselves irrelevant. The flexibility of drawdown, the absence of a compulsory annuity, and the ability to manage retirement income tax-efficiently remain unchanged. But the estate planning argument for deferring drawdown beyond retirement needs is considerably weakened.
A Decade On: The Balance Sheet
What has the decade of pension freedoms delivered?
The gains:
- Genuine flexibility for a hugely diverse population of savers
- Better fit between pension vehicles and personal circumstances
- Rational annuity purchase decisions (where annuities are now chosen, not compelled)
- Improved product innovation in drawdown management
- Greater pension literacy among people who are now actively engaged with their retirement savings
The losses:
- Increased complexity for unsophisticated savers
- Significant pension scam losses, with billions fraudulently taken
- Unsustainable drawdown rates for savers without access to advice
- MPAA traps for returning workers
- Growing awareness that flexibility without guidance is not unambiguously beneficial
The consensus among pension professionals is that the freedoms were broadly right in direction — compulsory annuity purchase was an anachronism — but were introduced too quickly and without sufficient advisory safeguards for those who most needed guidance.
How Global Investments Can Help
Whether you accessed the pension freedoms wisely or want to ensure you do so going forward, the question of how to structure drawdown, manage investment risk, and optimise tax efficiency across a 20–30 year retirement is genuinely complex. Our advisers work with clients at every stage of drawdown — from initial retirement income planning through to sustainable withdrawal strategies and estate planning in the post-2027 IHT environment. Contact us to discuss your retirement income strategy.
Frequently asked questions
5 questions
What did the 2015 pension freedoms actually change?
Before April 2015, most people had to buy an annuity with their defined contribution pension. From April 2015, you can access a DC pension from age 55 in any way you choose — full encashment, drawdown, annuity, or any combination.
Link to this questionWhat happened to annuity sales after the pension freedoms?
Annuity purchases fell by approximately 75% following the freedoms as savers chose drawdown and flexible access instead. As annuity rates recovered post-2022, interest has returned, but volumes remain far below pre-2015 levels.
Link to this questionWhat is the MPAA and how does it relate to the pension freedoms?
The Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) is a reduced annual allowance of £10,000 that applies once you take any flexi-access drawdown. The pension freedoms created this side-effect — many savers triggered it unknowingly.
Link to this questionHow do the 2015 pension freedoms affect British expats?
Expats can access their UK DC pension under the freedoms from anywhere in the world. Drawing pension income while non-resident is possible; the tax treatment depends on the applicable double tax treaty.
Link to this questionHas any pension freedom been reversed?
Not directly. However, the 2027 change making pensions subject to inheritance tax is a policy shift in the opposite direction — pensions will be less attractive as estate planning vehicles from April 2027.
Link to this questionThis guide is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Pension rules, tax rates and programme details change; verify current requirements with a qualified and FCA-regulated pensions adviser before acting. Pension transfers involving defined benefits over £30,000 require regulated advice.
