Established 1994

financial-planning

Fee-Only vs Fee-Based Financial Advice: How Your Adviser Is Paid

Updated 6 min readBy Global Investments Editorial

How a financial adviser charges for their services is not merely a commercial question — it fundamentally shapes the type of advice you receive and, in some cases, creates conflicts of interest that may affect the recommendations made to you. Understanding the distinction between fee-only and fee-based advice, and knowing what to look for on an adviser's fee schedule, is an important part of choosing the right professional relationship.

The Retail Distribution Review and Its Legacy

Until the end of 2012, UK financial advisers could receive commission payments from product providers — meaning that the products they recommended generated income for the adviser directly, regardless of whether those products were the best fit for the client. A fund charging 1.5% per annum might pay the adviser a trail commission of 0.5%; an investment bond might pay an initial commission of up to 7%.

The Retail Distribution Review (RDR), implemented from January 2013, abolished commission payments for new advised business in the UK. Advisers were required to:

  • Charge clients directly for their services (either fees or an agreed ongoing percentage)
  • Describe themselves either as "independent" (able to recommend any product from the whole market) or "restricted" (advising on a limited range or from a defined panel)
  • Hold appropriate qualifications (minimum Diploma in Financial Planning)

The RDR significantly improved transparency but did not fully eliminate the conflicts it aimed to address. Some models introduced under RDR label themselves "fee-based" rather than "fee-only" — and the difference matters.

Fee-Only Advice

A fee-only adviser charges the client directly for the time or services provided, and receives no payments, commissions, rebates, or other financial benefits from product providers or platforms. The fee schedule is entirely transparent: the client knows exactly what the advice costs and that the recommendation is not influenced by financial incentives elsewhere.

Fee-only advisers may charge:

  • An hourly rate (typically £150–£400 per hour depending on seniority and location)
  • A fixed fee for a defined piece of work (e.g. £2,000–£5,000 for a retirement planning review)
  • A percentage of assets under advice agreed with the client (typically 0.5%–1.0% per annum for ongoing advisory relationships)

The fee-only model is the cleanest from a conflicts-of-interest perspective. Because the adviser's income is independent of which product is selected, they have no financial incentive to prefer one provider over another.

Fee-Based Advice

The term fee-based is less clearly defined and requires scrutiny. A fee-based adviser typically charges the client a fee but may also receive some additional forms of income — for example, rebates from platforms, reduced charges in return for directing business, or fees for services provided to product providers.

Under UK FCA rules, advisers must disclose all their income sources in a Client Agreement and in their Initial Disclosure Document. If an adviser describes themselves as "fee-based" rather than "fee-only", ask specifically:

  • Do you or your firm receive any payments from platforms, product providers, or other third parties?
  • If so, how are these payments handled, and how do they affect my charges?

Where payments from third parties are received and passed back to clients in the form of lower fees or reduced charges, the arrangement can be transparent and fair. Where they are retained by the firm without a corresponding reduction in client charges, the conflict is real.

Percentage Fees vs Flat Fees vs Hourly Rates

Each fee structure has different implications depending on your situation.

Percentage of assets under advice (AUA): The most common model for ongoing advisory relationships. An annual charge of 1% on a £500,000 portfolio costs £5,000 per year; on a £2 million portfolio it costs £20,000. As your wealth grows, so does the adviser's income — even if the complexity of the advice does not increase proportionally. For very large portfolios, percentage fees can become disproportionate to the service provided. Always ask whether the percentage reduces at higher asset levels (a tiered charging structure is common among better firms).

Flat fee: A defined cost for a defined service, irrespective of asset value. This is fairer for larger portfolios and ensures the fee reflects the work done rather than the size of the client's wealth. However, flat fees may make advice less accessible to those with smaller investable assets.

Hourly rate: Transparent but potentially unpredictable if the engagement grows in complexity. Better suited to discrete, one-off pieces of advice rather than ongoing relationships.

Hybrid: Many firms charge an initial fee for an advice report or financial plan, then switch to an ongoing percentage for portfolio management and regular reviews. This is a reasonable approach provided the ongoing fee is commensurate with the service being received.

Platform Charges

Financial advisers who arrange investments on your behalf will typically use an investment platform — a custodial service that holds your assets, generates statements, and enables portfolio management. These platforms charge fees, separate from the adviser's own fees.

Platform fees typically range from 0.15% to 0.45% per annum of assets held. They are in addition to:

  • The adviser's fee
  • The underlying fund or investment fees (OCF/TER of typically 0.07% for passive funds to 0.8%+ for active funds)

The total cost of advice and investment — the "all-in" cost — is the relevant figure for comparison. A cheap adviser on an expensive platform with expensive funds may cost more than a slightly pricier adviser on an efficient platform with low-cost funds.

The FCA requires advisers to provide a clear breakdown of all charges in their disclosure documents. Ask for the "total expense" across all layers before making a decision.

Independent vs Restricted Advisers

Under RDR, advisers must be clear about whether they are independent or restricted.

Independent: The adviser must consider all products and providers from the whole market and must give unbiased advice. They are free to recommend any product type and any provider.

Restricted: The adviser advises on a limited range of products, or from a defined panel of providers. This is not necessarily inferior — a restricted adviser with deep expertise in specific areas (e.g. occupational pensions, SIPPs, or specific offshore structures) may be better qualified for your particular needs than a generalist independent. The key is to understand what the restriction is and whether it is relevant to your situation.

Most large wealth managers and private banks offer restricted advice, typically restricted to their own product suite or a preferred provider panel. This is disclosed in their regulatory paperwork.

Questions to Ask Before Engaging an Adviser

Before engaging any financial adviser, ask the following:

  1. Are you fee-only, and do you receive any income from third parties in connection with my account?
  2. Are you independent or restricted? If restricted, what is the nature of the restriction?
  3. What is your fee structure — percentage, flat, or hourly? Are there minimum fees?
  4. What platform will you use, and what does the platform charge?
  5. Can you provide a total cost illustration across adviser fee, platform fee, and fund costs?
  6. What qualifications do you hold? Are you a Certified Financial Planner or Chartered Financial Planner?
  7. Are you authorised and regulated by the FCA? (Check the FCA Register at register.fca.org.uk)

The FCA register is public and free to use. Any individual or firm providing regulated financial advice in the UK must be listed on it. Checking this takes two minutes and eliminates a significant fraud risk.

How Global Investments Can Help

At Global Investments, our fee structures are transparent and disclosed in full at the outset of every client relationship. We work with internationally mobile, high-net-worth individuals whose needs span investment management, pensions planning, tax strategy, and estate planning — and we ensure that advice is coordinated, impartial, and properly matched to each client's objectives. If you would like to discuss our approach to fees and the scope of services we provide, please contact us for a confidential conversation.

This article is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute regulated financial advice. Always verify the regulatory status of any adviser before engaging. Investments can fall as well as rise; past performance is not a reliable guide to future results.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Rules, prices and regulations change; verify current requirements with a qualified adviser before acting.

Speak to a Global Investments adviser

Our independent advisers work with internationally mobile clients on pensions, investments, tax planning, and international financial structures.