Established 1994

investments

Strategic Use of Debt for HNW Investors

Updated 6 min readBy Global Investments Editorial

In popular financial culture, debt is treated as inherently problematic — something to be eliminated as quickly as possible. For HNW investors who understand leverage and can manage its risks, this framing is simplistic and can be counterproductive. Strategic use of debt against well-structured assets can enhance wealth accumulation, improve tax efficiency, and preserve liquidity without requiring the forced realisation of investments. This guide explains how HNW individuals deploy debt as a financial planning tool, and the risks that must be managed carefully.

The Fundamental Logic: When Borrowing Enhances Wealth

Borrowing to invest makes financial sense when the after-tax return on the investment funded by the debt is reliably expected to exceed the after-tax cost of the debt. If you can borrow at 4.5% after tax, and invest in an asset expected to compound at 7–8% after tax, the leverage gap between these two rates compounds in your favour over time — provided the expectations are met and the leverage does not expose you to liquidity or forced-sale risk in the interim.

The same logic applies when borrowing releases capital that would otherwise be illiquid (property equity, concentrated stock) for diversified deployment. Here, the benefit is not just the borrowing-investment return spread; it is also the risk reduction from diversification.

The risks that counteract this logic are:

  1. Investment returns are uncertain; borrowing costs are (at variable rates) uncertain; the gap can disappear or reverse
  2. Leverage amplifies losses: if the investment falls 30%, a 50% leveraged position produces a 60% loss of equity
  3. Margin calls and covenants can force sales at the worst moment
  4. The psychological and administrative burden of managing leveraged positions is non-trivial

Lombard Lending Against Investment Portfolios

Lombard lending (also called portfolio-backed lending or securities-backed lending) involves borrowing against a pledged investment portfolio held with a private bank or custodian. The lender extends a credit line — typically 50–80% of the portfolio's market value depending on asset class and liquidity — secured by the pledge.

Primary uses:

  • Bridge financing for a property purchase before selling another property
  • Tax payments or other large one-off obligations without liquidating investments (avoiding CGT crystallisation)
  • Business capital requirements without disrupting the investment portfolio
  • Funding private equity capital calls or co-investment opportunities with short notice

Typical terms: Rates are typically floating, linked to bank base rate or SONIA, with a margin of 0.5–2% depending on the borrower's relationship and portfolio quality. Interest is charged on the drawn amount only. Lines are usually demand facilities — the bank can call them on relatively short notice, which is the key risk.

The margin call risk: If the portfolio value falls, the LTV ratio rises. If it exceeds the permitted level, the bank will require additional collateral or repayment. In severe market falls, the forced liquidation of pledged assets at depressed values is precisely the wrong time to sell — this is the core danger of Lombard lending and has damaged many HNW portfolios in market crises.

Mitigation: Maintain a comfortable buffer below the maximum LTV at all times. Never use Lombard lending to fund consumption spending; it is a liquidity and bridge financing tool. Stress-test the portfolio against a 30–40% fall and ensure the position remains solvent.

Property Re-Leverage

Property owners who purchased unencumbered property — or who have paid down mortgages significantly — can re-leverage through a remortgage or equity release, freeing capital for deployment elsewhere while retaining ownership of the property.

The logic is straightforward: if a property worth £2 million is held unencumbered, the full £2 million is earning property-market returns (capital appreciation plus rental yield minus costs). By taking a mortgage of £1 million at 4.5%, the £1 million cash released can be invested in a diversified portfolio. If the portfolio returns 7% per annum and the mortgage costs 4.5%, the spread of 2.5% on £1 million is £25,000 per year before tax — a positive carry that compounds.

Tax considerations: Mortgage interest on buy-to-let investment property owned personally is not fully deductible for income tax purposes under the Section 24 rules (relief restricted to basic rate). This reduces the net cost advantage of leveraged buy-to-let relative to pre-2017. For commercial property or properties held in limited companies, interest deductibility is different and requires specific tax advice.

For owner-occupied residential property, interest on a remortgage used to fund investments is not tax-deductible — the deductibility follows the purpose of the loan, not the security. A mortgage taken to purchase a buy-to-let property has deductible interest (within S.24 limits); a mortgage taken against a primary residence to fund ISA investments does not.

Premium Financing for Life Insurance (PACs)

Premium-financed life insurance, also known as a PAC (Premium Advance Contract) or PPLI financing, involves using borrowed funds to pay insurance premiums on a large whole-of-life or universal life policy, typically held offshore for estate planning purposes.

The structure works as follows: a significant life policy (often £5–50 million of death benefit) is funded by loans rather than the policyholder's own cash. The policy cash value accumulates and ultimately services the loan; the excess death benefit passes to beneficiaries. The appeal is that large life cover can be maintained as part of an estate plan without the policyholder being required to allocate substantial capital upfront.

Risks and complexities: If the policy's internal rate of return is insufficient to cover loan interest over time, the policyholder must contribute additional funds. Policy performance is linked to the underlying investment sub-accounts, which carry market risk. The structure requires careful management, transparent insurance and lending counterparties, and professional annual review. Premium financing is not suitable for all HNW individuals and requires specialist advice.

Investment Bonds with Loan-Back Structures

UK and offshore investment bonds have been used in conjunction with loan-back arrangements as a form of leveraged investment. In a simple structure: the policyholder funds an offshore bond, then borrows from the bond provider or an associated lender using the bond as security. The borrowed funds are deployed in further investments, while the bond compounds internally on a tax-deferred basis.

HMRC has scrutinised many of these arrangements, particularly where they appear designed primarily to avoid or defer tax rather than for genuine investment purposes. The boundary between legitimate loan-back (which is a standard commercial feature of some offshore bond structures) and tax avoidance has been the subject of litigation and HMRC guidance. Any loan-back arrangement should be reviewed by a specialist tax adviser before implementation.

Borrowing to Invest: The Risks in a Rising Rate Environment

The 2022–2023 rate cycle was a reminder that borrowing costs are not static. An investor who in 2020 borrowed at 1.5% floating rate to fund equity investments faced a borrowing cost of 5.5% by late 2023 — at exactly the same time as equity markets had fallen 20–25%. The double squeeze of rising borrowing costs and falling asset values is the scenario that leveraged investors fear most, and it materialised in that period.

The lesson: leverage should be calibrated to what the position can withstand under stress scenarios, not just the base case. A useful rule of thumb is that leverage should be serviced by the income from the underlying assets (rent, dividends, coupons) without reliance on capital appreciation. If the investment produces no income and is purely a capital appreciation play, borrowing to fund it is speculative.

Recourse vs Non-Recourse Lending

Most UK and European property lending is full-recourse: if the property value falls below the loan amount and the lender enforces, the borrower remains personally liable for any shortfall. Non-recourse lending (where the lender's only recourse is to the asset, not the borrower personally) exists in some commercial property structures and certain private financing arrangements, but is rare in mainstream residential lending. Understanding whether a loan is full-recourse before signing is essential.

How Global Investments Can Help

Strategic use of debt is a legitimate and powerful wealth management tool, but it requires careful structuring, regular review, and integration with the overall financial plan. Our advisers assist HNW clients in assessing leverage opportunities — Lombard facilities, property re-leverage, premium financing — against their specific risk tolerance, tax position, and liquidity requirements. We work with a network of private banks, specialist mortgage brokers, and insurance finance specialists. Contact us to discuss whether strategic borrowing could enhance your wealth plan.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Rules, prices and regulations change; verify current requirements with a qualified adviser before acting.

Speak to a Global Investments adviser

Our independent advisers work with internationally mobile clients on pensions, investments, tax planning, and international financial structures.